Research Report
Ⅰ. Background and Purpose of Research
□ Clarification of Legislative standards
○ The institutionalization of evaluation in the legislative debate on policy evaluation and review has important implications
○ The contents of the policy evaluation and analysis of the strengths and weaknesses complement the legislative measures of evaluation institutionalization were examined
□ Research Scope and Method
○ Theoretical Study : Concept and nature
○ Study of Comparative Law
Ⅱ. Policy Evaluation and Legislative Evaluation
□ Institiutional Approach analysis comparing the United States, Japan, the UK has as its target.
□ Through this analysis, and review ways to improve our country's policy evaluation system was examined.
□ European Union, the continental system (Germany, Switzerland, Austria, France), Anglo-American legal system (the United Kingdom and the United States, Canada, AIn general, the policy process to check the policy evaluation and performance verification, review activities, but the legislation is targeted at the legislative evaluation.ustralia), Japan were investigated to evaluate legislation.
□ Differences in terms of policies and legislation that has a different approach. In other words, Policy evaluation is central to the calculation results, the methodology capable of objective measurement and analysis in the area have been systematized.
□ But, Legislative evaluation focused on the specific legislation, and also objective analysis methodology, including the effect of subjective methods of analysis are also aided.
Ⅲ. The Relationship and Comparative Analysis
□ Characteristics and problems of our country for policy evaluation is:
○ a thorough central control,
○ lack of participation of experts evaluation,
○ evaluation of the sequencing,
○ evaluate the effectiveness of the problem,
○ passive participation of agencies working.
○ To guarantee the objectivity of rating agencies is necessary to establish the device.
○ Creating and Parsing of the manual for the evaluation of methods, standards, and it is necessary to present very detailed.
○ Clarify the scope and criteria of evaluation and the evaluation should be stepped up cooperation with the actual work.
□ In order to increase the effectiveness of policy evaluation are presented:
○ to match the policy cycle and the evaluation cycle,
○ the evaluation will ensure the representativeness or inclusiveness,
○ will enable the internal assessment,
○ evaluation and management of results Integration and utilization,
○ the use of quantitative evaluation methods and evaluation methods improve the scientific nature,
○ and enhance the professionalism of the internal and external experts to ensure participation, etc.
○ Evaluation of each evaluation factor by preparing guidelines and standards related matters in the evaluation of experts and government agencies for the evaluation of assessment methods and statistical analysis methods such as opinion surveys and assessment methods appropriate to the integration standards and measures that can be shall be presented.