OAK Repository

Metadata Downloads
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOti Anukpe Ovrawah-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-07T07:19:09Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-07T07:19:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-31-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.klri.re.kr:9443/handle/2017.oak/9802-
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the role of the Nigerian judiciary in upholding interna tional human rights laws and principles in their adjudicatory functions concern ing protection of the rights of women. In Nigeria, women make up about 49% of
the population.1
In 2019, the estimated population of Nigeria is over 200.96 mil lion, ranking 7th in the world.2
The Office of the High Commissioner on Human
Rights states that “Despite various efforts and concerns shown by local and inter national human rights groups, women who account for almost half of the entire
population, generally lagged behind in all aspects of life (economically, socially,
politically and intellectually)”.3
Human rights of women, as a vulnerable group,
have been captured in several regional and international conventions, and Nige ria is a party to several treaties that protect these rights. This paper reflects on how
the Nigerian judiciary has, through various judicial pronouncements received,
responded and interacted with international human rights law and principles in
the context of promoting and protecting women’s rights and developing robust
jurisprudence thereto. Ten (10) Nigerian superior court judgments on protection
of women from discrimination are considered, on whether they confront barriers
that promote discrimination and inequality, and how the courts could strengthen
their judgments with international human rights treaties as done through the Indi an Supreme Courts best practice cases on judicial activism.
-
dc.publisher한국법제연구원-
dc.titleNigerian Courts and Human Rights Jurisprudence: Promoting Non-Discrimination in the Context of Women’s Rights-
dc.citation.date2020-
dc.citation.endPage77-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.publisher한국법제연구원-
dc.citation.startPage45-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationVol. 10 Issue. 1 Page. 45-77, 2020-
dc.identifier.localId18054k-
dc.rights.accessRights원문무료이용-
dc.subject.keywordNigeria-
dc.subject.keywordCourts-
dc.subject.keywordJudgments-
dc.subject.keywordWomen-
dc.subject.keywordCustoms-
dc.subject.keywordDiscrimina tion-
dc.subject.keywordHuman Rights-
dc.subject.keywordActivism-
dc.subject.keywordJurisprudence-
dc.title.partNameArticles-
dc.type.localKLRI Journal of Law and Legislation-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityOti Anukpe Ovrawah-
dc.description.tableOfContentsI. Introduction
II. Nigeria’s Obligations under Core International Human Rights Instruments
III. The Place of Customary Laws in Hierarchy of Laws in Nigeria
IV. Judicial Approach to Protection of Women's Rights and Utilization of
International Human Rights Treaty Provisions or Otherwise
A. Mojekwu v. Mojekwu (1997)
B. Augustine Nwafor Mojekwu v. Mrs. Theresa Iwuchukwu (2004)
C. Uke &Anor. v. Iro (2001)
D. Okonkwo Timothy (Alias Job) v. Sunday of orka & Anor.(2007)
E. Miss Yetunde Zainab Tolani v. Kwara State Judicial Service Commission &
Ors. (2009)
F. Dr. Priye Iyalla-Amadi v. Comptroller General Nigeria Immigration Services
(2009)
G. Mrs. Lois Chituru Ukeje & Anor. v. Mrs.Gladys Ada Ukeje (2014)
H. Onyibor Anekwe & Anor. v. Mrs. Maria Nweke (2014)
I. Mr. Afam Okeke v. Madam Helen Okeke (2017)
J. Ordu & Ors. v. Elewa & Ors. (2018)
V. Overview of the Use of International Human Rights Instruments in the
Judgements
VI. Conclusion
-
Files in This Item:

qrcode

  • mendeley

해당 아이템을 이메일로 공유하기 원하시면 인증을 거치시기 바랍니다.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse